Financial-grade payment processing with ACID compliance and fraud prevention
High-throughput payment processing API guaranteeing transactional integrity, idempotency, and double-spend prevention for financial systems.
Target Throughput: Millions of transactions per day • Latency: Sub-second processing • Reliability: ACID compliance with strong transactional integrity
HTOS uses a multi-layered architecture designed for correctness and scalability:
Client Request
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ ASP.NET Core API Layer │
│ ├─ Validation │
│ ├─ Idempotency Check │
│ └─ Payment Orchestration │
└──────────┬──────────────────┘
│
┌──────┴──────┐
│ │
▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ MySQL │ │ Redis │
│ ACID TX │ │ Cache │
│ Tables │ │ Keys │
└─────────┘ └─────────┘
Request validation, authentication, idempotency handling, payment orchestration, structured logging and telemetry
ACID transactions with READ COMMITTED isolation, row-level locking, balance consistency checks, and ledger entries
O(1) idempotency key lookups, prevents duplicate transactions during retry storms, reduces DB contention
Business rule enforcement, entity integrity validation, domain exceptions, and type-safe payment operations
Prevents unauthorized duplicate charges through atomic database transactions:
Ensures same result for duplicate requests, critical for network reliability:
Idempotency-Key header with unique GUIDSelected for strong transactional guarantees, row-level locking, and proven reliability in financial systems.
Provides O(1) idempotency lookups and drastically reduces database contention under high-volume retry scenarios.
Guarantees absolute correctness by preventing concurrent modifications to the same account during processing.
Encapsulates business rules within domain entities, making payment logic clear, testable, and maintainable.
While the current architecture is robust, here are identified bottlenecks and mitigation strategies:
Issue: Heavy concurrent writes to same account cause lock contention
Mitigation: Horizontal scaling via read replicas, query optimization, and potentially distributed transaction coordinators
Issue: Unbounded idempotency key storage can exhaust memory
Mitigation: Configurable TTL policies, automatic eviction strategies, and memory monitoring
Issue: Thread pool exhaustion under spike traffic without rate limiting
Mitigation: Implement rate limiting (ready with Redis), circuit breakers, and async/await patterns